Fotastika.com

!

: «Ôîòî èë 96»



Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:12:10
Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:12:10


« (16) »


Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:14:18
Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:14:02
Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:13:47
Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:13:30



Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:13:19
Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:12:54
Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:12:44
Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:12:31

Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:12:21
Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:12:10
Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:11:53
Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:11:37

Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:11:24
Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:11:12
Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:10:57
Ôîòî èë 96 @ 24-07-2007 23:10:41




, (*), .

  (*):
E-mail:
  (*):

 
:

Lyzbeth @ 27.04.2016 (04:40:20)
If my garden was of a size and style suitable for a statue like yo82vu&17;#e shown, I’d certainly consider it. Though I’m not terribly fond of the one in the photo, I have seen a few large nude garden statues that I like (certainly some based on classics).I do have a small statue of a nude…a young boy holding a bird.Though beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I’d like to think that if I did choose a nude for my front yard, it would be tasteful enough not to offend anyone. (I could be totally wrong about that, of course!)


: